Hugo Chavez, The Passing of a Political Tsunami

By Joel Hirst

  • SOP AP SPANI SPAN  RU_Garc.jpg

For the next days and weeks there will be many Op-Eds and articles analyzing  the impact of the premature demise of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. His  legacy will be dissected; the effects of his political and economic model he  dubbed “21st Century Socialism” will be fiercely defended by his admirers and  sharply criticized by his detractors. Who will take charge next? Will elections  be called within 30 days as is demanded by the constitution? Who will face now  acting President Nicolás Maduro for the highest political prize in the land?  Will there be a resurgence of the famous battle between Maduro and National  Assembly President Diosdado Cabello? And what role will the government of Cuba  have in a post-Chávez Venezuela? All of these are important issues and deserve  all the attention they will receive.

Nevertheless, for a moment it’s important to step back, take a breath and  consider what just occurred. The political tsunami that was Hugo Chávez and his “Bolivarian Revolution” cannot be understated. A cursory glance through the  pages of Latin American newspapers over the last decade – or in conversations  with politicians and academics – serve to ratify the tremendous impact that  placed this individual at the center of regional politics for more than ten  years.

Like other famous Latin American caudillos –figures such as Juan  Perón, Rafael Trujillo, Ernesto “Che” Guevara, and Fidel Castro– Hugo Chávez  seemed to be the incarnation of an era. Through his endless seven hour tirades,  punctuated with abusive language and obscure historical analysis he enthralled  his followers. “Expropriate it” he would often yell, grinning maniacally as his  mobs applauded the most recent of the almost 1,000 nationalizations  (expropriations) that destroyed the private sector of his country. He would sing “rancheras” for hours and one time he spent more than 45 minutes personally  knocking down walls for the building of a new metro — all live-fed on the radio  and TV takeovers which he was so fond of and that fed his narcissism so  well.

He seemed to relish his controversial foreign policy even more. His constant  attacks on the United States frustrated American policymakers to no end.  Expelling American Ambassadors, verbal fights with the King of Spain and  episodes of grade-school name calling left world leaders scratching their heads.  There was not a controversy that Chávez did not seek out – whether it be 9/11 “truther” conspiracies or doubting whether man actually made it to the moon; and  in the last years blaming the United States for the cancer that eventually  killed him. There was also not a tyrant the world over who did not find  solidarity in Hugo Chávez. Robert Mugabe, Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, Mahmood  Ahmadinejad, Muammar Gaddafi, Daniel Ortega, and Bashar al Assad all turned to  Chávez for support and largesse.

As with all dictators, the Caribbean’s latest despot could be wicked. He  personally sentenced Judge Maria Lourdes Afiuni to prison, where she still sits  today. He arbitrarily closed RCTV, the largest and oldest TV station in the  country; payback for its unwaveringly critical editorial line. He ordered the  preparing of massive lists of his adversaries – like the Maisanta List  with the names of 3.5 million of his personal enemies. He centralized all power  in himself, nano-managing Venezuela through midnight cabinet meetings and  twilight phone calls that always kept his ministers on pins and needles. He did  not blink an eye when using judicial process, the tax services and regulatory  agencies to persecute those who opposed him. And he seemed genuinely baffled on  the very rare occasions when his opponents pointed out that the country was not  his personal fiefdom and the national treasury was not his petty cash box.

There is no doubt that Venezuela is today a better place for his passing.  Besides his larger-than-life persona and endless material for policy makers,  political analysts and freedom activists to chew on, the truth of the matter is  that after the inebriation of his 14 years in office wears off, all he has left  Venezuela with is a bad hangover.

Nevertheless, friend and foe alike must admit that Hugo Chávez was one of the  great men. Not great in terms of goodness — he was not a good man. But great in  that he emerged from roots deep in rural poverty, negotiated the takeover of his  country and maneuvered it for a time to the center of hemispheric politics. This  is no small feat; in point of fact they are tremendous shoes for Nicolas Maduro –a failed bus driver– to attempt to fill.


Joel D. Hirst is a Principal at Cordoba Group International and author of  “El Teniente de San Porfirio,” a novel on Socialist Venezuela by Grito Sagrado  Press

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>