Remembering the Rwandan Genocide: The Difficulty to Remember All Victims
20 years ago the 1994 Rwandan genocide started. In just 100 days some 800,000 to a million people were killed. The world stood by, the international community did literally nothing. The phrase “never again” coined after the Holocaust got an empty phrase. Although, very ironically, Rwanda was on the UN Security Council at the time, the killing was only stopped by the Rwandese Patriotic Front (RPF) that invaded the country from Uganda and stopped the killing. Today, Rwanda and the world is remembering the 1994 genocide, although not all victims are commemorated.
The events started when president Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, was killed when his plane was shot down over Kigali. Hutu extremists blamed the RPF and the Tutsi in general for murdering the president and started the genocide. However, it was identified in 2012 by a French inquiry that Hutu extremist groups themselves shot down the plane. Immediately after the death of Habyarimana, road blocks were established and men, women and children of all ages butchered with machetes, guns and grenades. The genocide was carried out by the Rwandese army, local police, national guard and the militia group known as Interahamwe. Rape was a widely observed phenomenon. Many people tried to flee and left their homes behind.
Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo called the genocide “the most brutally efficient killing spree in human history.” And rightly so, I would not be aware of any other genocide where so many people were killed in such a short time. The killing was planned and the Hutu extremists were able to rely on the at least indirect support of foreign powers. Rightfully, the Rwandan President Paul Kagame suggested in Jeune Afrique that France and Belgium were involved in the genocide. Kagame said that they better face the “difficult truth.” That has caused a diplomatic row, because France is clearly not ready to face the truth.
When I visited Rwanda in 2011, I was impressed by the amazing beauty of the country and how organized the country is, the cleanliness of the streets. I was also very much impressed by the Kigali Genocide Memorial Center that clearly was very much influenced by Yad Vashem in Jerusalem and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC. The exhibition is very moving and the story of events is very well presented. Outside of the museum are a couple of gardens with many symbols that represent Rwandese mourning. It is all very impressive if there would not be quite a disturbing fact: only Tutsi seemed to die during the genocide. Moderate Hutus were excluded. And also the atrocities committed by RPF forces when they invaded the country to stop the genocide are not debated. Why? It is simply not in the interest of the ruling elite in Kigali that still very much is based on the forces that were part of the RPF, not least Paul Kagame himself. In short, the regime in Kigali purposefully tries to promote some stories while others are openly oppressed.
A great article has been written by René Lemarchand on the memorialization process in Rwanda and how the discourse changed of what happened during the genocide. While at the beginning all victims were remembered, the narrative changed significantly during the past years. I have observed that myself during a commemoration event at Georgetown University in Washington DC in April 2012. Instead of commemorating the victims of the genocide, only Tutsi were remembered. While it is clear to all sides that the large majority of victims were indeed Tutsi, it is nonetheless a very problematic turn towards purposefully excluding some victims. Among the Rwandan leadership there is a huge fear that the number of victims is constantly put down as some sources suggest that it was not a million people who were killed but “at least 500,000” which would lower the amount of victims enormously. After all, however, it is a situation like with the Holocaust. An exact number cannot be established. And yet, everyone refers to six million Jewish victims during WWII. Equally, the enormity of the crimes during the Rwandan genocide will not be challenged, as some people around Kagame fear.
Today, Rwanda is by many means a show case for reform and highlighted as a role model for the rest of the African continent. However, this image has been tarnished due to the allegations by the international community, including UN reports, that Rwanda supported the M23 rebels in the eastern DRC. Since the mid-1990s, Rwanda has continuously supported rebel groups – to fight Hutu extremists but also for economic benefit. In addition, the accounts that high-level Rwandese who have fallen out with the regime are accumulating. The recent case of former intelligence chief Patrick Karegeya in South Africa has caused concern not only in the host country but around the globe that any dissidents are threatened to be killed by the Rwandese government (read more in an excellent BBC analysis).
Official mourning began three months ago with a flame of remembrance touring towns and villages across the small central African nation, and culminated today when the torch arrived at the national genocide memorial. Kagame lit a flame that will burn for 100 days, the length of time it took government soldiers and “Hutu power” militiamen to carry out their plan to wipe out the enemy who was given names of insect, dehumanizing them. It is indeed of utmost importance to remember the hundred thousands of innocent victims who had die for no reason in the spring of 1994. And yet, the Rwandan leadership still has to grapple of how to remember the past and that will include the remembrance of all victims.